Flat 4, Harold House, 8 Brook Road, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN2 3AY

HAV/29UQ/MNR/2026/0063 · Decided 2026-06-12 · flat

£925current rent (pcm)
£975landlord proposed (pcm)
£975tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Tenant reported wear and tear and disrepair (including boiler issues) not addressed by the landlord during the tenancy; the determined rent assumed the property was in good, modernised condition.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: yes. Landlord submitted evidence: no.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal relied on its own expert knowledge of local rental values together with comparable listings submitted by the tenant (Rightmove asking rents of £850–£925 pcm for similar flats). It determined that a modernised flat in good condition, with white goods and curtains provided, would command £975 pcm in the open market, which matched the landlord's proposed rent. No evidence was submitted by the landlord, and the tenant's points about disrepair and lack of a shower did not alter the figure proposed in the landlord's notice.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.