Flat 4, 9 Selwyn Avenue, London E4 9LP

LON/00BH/MNR/2026/0167 · Decided 2026-06-01 · studio flat · 0 bed

£600current rent (pcm)
£1000landlord proposed (pcm)
£1000tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Previous landlord had not maintained the property well, but the current landlord was carrying out improvement works.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: no. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tenant proposed £700 pcm but provided no comparable rental evidence to support this. The landlord relied on Local Housing Allowance figures (£230.14/week), which the tribunal accepted as supporting the proposed rent despite acknowledging LHA is an average that can understate true market rents. With no tenant evidence to weigh against it, the tribunal adopted the landlord's proposed figure as the market rent in full.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.