Flat 4, 10 The Runway, South Ruislip, HA4 6EU

LON/00AS/MNR/2026/0119 · Decided 2026-05-19 · studio flat · 0 bed

£900current rent (pcm)
£1097landlord proposed (pcm)
£925tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Converted studio flat reported by the tenant to have suffered persistent water damage from the flat above and a small floor area.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: yes. Landlord submitted evidence: no.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal assessed a starting market rent of £1,000 pcm for a modernised studio flat in good condition in a residential area, based on its own expertise and the tenant's limited comparable evidence, which was given little weight due to its wide geographic spread. It then deducted £75 pcm to reflect the property's reported condition (water damage) and its location in a secondary commercial rather than established residential environment, arriving at £925 pcm. The increase was not found to cause undue hardship, so the new rent took effect from the date in the landlord's notice.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.