Flat 3, Kent House, 59 Royal Parade, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN22 7AQ

HAV/21UC/MNR/2024/0637 · Decided 2025-01-21 · flat

£575current rent (pcm)
£650landlord proposed (pcm)
£615tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Property had various items of disrepair, no central heating, no washing machine, and no double glazing.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: no. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal began from a market rent of £700 pcm for the property in good condition, based on the landlord's comparable evidence and its own expert knowledge of local rental values. It then deducted £85 for identified disrepair and lack of amenities (£50 disrepair/condition, £25 no central heating, £10 no washing machine), arriving at £615 pcm. The tenant's suggestion of £600-£625 was noted but the tribunal reached its own figure via the itemised valuation.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.