Flat 2, 111 Fordwych Road, London, NW2 3NJ

LON/00AG/MNR/2026/0326 · Decided 2026-06-15 · flat · 3 bed

£1400current rent (pcm)
£3500landlord proposed (pcm)
£2800tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Ground floor flat with central heating and double glazing, suffering from subsidence damage (tree root related, under insurance claim), with a disputed basement room/bathroom of low ceiling height.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: no. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal relied on the landlord's two comparables (larger 4-bed/3-bath flats) and its own expertise to value the property in good condition at around £4,000 pcm, then deducted 30% (£1,200) to reflect the subsidence damage and disadvantageous basement rooms, arriving at £2,800 pcm. The tenant provided no comparable evidence to support her suggested range. The effective date was deferred from the notice date to the decision date due to undue hardship, as the tenant was on universal credit.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.