First Floor Flat (4c), Cricketfield Rd, London, E5 8NS

LON/00AM/MNR/2026/0378 · Decided 2026-07-10 · flat · 1 bed

£1600current rent (pcm)
£1700landlord proposed (pcm)
£1650tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: The flat has poorly fitting, draughty sash windows (one painted shut) and no room thermostat, though it was substantially redecorated before the tenancy began.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: yes. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal rejected the landlord's comparables as unevidenced and relied on its own knowledge, setting a starting market rent of £1700 pcm for the property in good modernised condition. It then deducted £50 for the lack of a room thermostat and the poor condition of the windows, arriving at £1650 pcm. The tribunal also found that allowing the increase to take effect on the notice date would not cause undue hardship despite the tenant's reduced income.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.