Apartment 7 1 Woodbrook Grove Northfield Birmingham, B31 2FP

BIR/00CN/MRA/2026/0008 · Decided 2026-08-06 · flat · 2 bed

£1100current rent (pcm)
£1150landlord proposed (pcm)
£1150tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Modernised first-floor flat in a modern development, though tenant reported issues including an old electric boiler, lukewarm shower water, high electricity bills, and a faulty gate fob.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: yes. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

No hearing or inspection was held; the matter was decided on the papers (MR1/MR2/MR3 forms). The Tribunal weighed the tenant's lower comparables (largely unupgraded/ground floor) against the landlord's single comparable and claimed refurbishment spend, and used its own expert knowledge of local rental values to conclude the market rent for the property if modernised and in good order, with white goods and curtains provided, would be £1,150 pcm — matching the landlord's proposed figure.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.