Apartment 304, Silkhouse Court, 7 Tithebarn Street, Liverpool, L2 2AA

MAN/00BY/MNR/2025/1068 · Decided 2026-04-17 · studio flat · 0 bed

£675current rent (pcm)
£750landlord proposed (pcm)
£675tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Fully furnished third-floor studio apartment with a bathroom; tenant alleged historic water ingress and a non-operative lift but provided no evidence of ongoing issues.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: yes. Landlord submitted evidence: no.

Tribunal's reasoning

The landlord proposed increasing the rent from £675 to £750 pcm. The tenant raised concerns about historic water ingress and a lift being out of service, but provided no evidence of ongoing water ingress or unresolved repairs. Without an inspection, the Tribunal relied on its general knowledge of market rents in the vicinity and available evidence, making no adjustment for the condition issues raised, and determined the market rent at the existing level of £675 pcm.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.