82 Acanthus Drive, Bermondsey, London, SE1 5HJ

LON/00BE/MNR/2026/0308 · Decided 2026-07-20 · maisonette · 2 bed

£1326current rent (pcm)
£1900landlord proposed (pcm)
£1900tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Purpose-built maisonette with carpets, double glazing and electric storage heaters, parking and a front garden but no rear garden.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: no. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal rejected arguments that a contractual rent review clause superseded the statutory section 13 process, finding both competing tenancy agreements were now periodic and section 13 applied. Relying on landlord-supplied comparables (excluding the last five, considered unrepresentative) and its own expert knowledge of the local market, the tribunal determined a market rent of £1,900 pcm, matching the landlord's proposed figure. Due to the tenant's accepted hardship (Universal Credit recipient, disabled), the new rent was set to take effect from the decision date rather than the earlier date in the landlord's notice.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.