8 Roy's Close, Ludgershall, Andover, Hampshire, SP11 9DD

HAV/00HY/MNR/2024/0635 · Decided 2025-02-21 · flat

£600current rent (pcm)
£624landlord proposed (pcm)
£620tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Property located above retail premises on the High Street, difficult to heat with electric storage heaters, EPC rating E-42, tenant responsible for internal decorations, no white goods or curtains provided.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: no. Landlord submitted evidence: no.

Tribunal's reasoning

In the absence of comparable evidence from either party, the Tribunal used its own expert knowledge to assess the market rent for the property in good condition at £800 pcm. It then applied deductions totalling £180 to reflect the poor EPC rating, the location above retail premises on the High Street, lack of central heating (only electric storage heaters), the tenant's responsibility for internal decorations, and the absence of white goods or curtains, arriving at a determined rent of £620 pcm effective from the date specified in the landlord's notice.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.