63 Morris Close Luton Beds LU3 3TR
Condition: The property, part of a 1980s low-rise block, appeared externally in fair to good condition with double glazing and gas central heating provided by the landlord.
Evidence considered
- No comparable evidence was submitted by either party
- Tribunal used its own general knowledge of market rent levels in Luton
- Google Streetview inspection used to assess external condition and specification (no physical inspection conducted)
Tenant submitted evidence: no. Landlord submitted evidence: no.
Tribunal's reasoning
The tribunal relied on its own general knowledge of market rent levels in Luton rather than specific comparable evidence, as neither party submitted comparables. It concluded the property would let on normal AST terms at the landlord's proposed figure of £975 pcm, with no adjustments needed, and determined the market rent at that level.
Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)
Want the evidence, not just the decision?
Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.
Landlord evidence pack — from £15
Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.
Register interest in the landlord packTenant pack — from £19
Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.
Register interest in the tenant packNot built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.