62 Maryland Avenue, Swaffham Bulbeck, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB25 0LT

CAM/12UC/MNR/2026/0018 · Decided 2026-03-12

—current rent (pcm)
—landlord proposed (pcm)
—tribunal decided (pcm)

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: no. Landlord submitted evidence: no.

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal did not determine a market rent because it found it lacked jurisdiction. The tenancy agreement contained a rent review clause (paragraph 5) allowing the landlord to increase or decrease rent after the first 12 months on one month's notice, which brought the tenancy within section 13(1)(b) of the Housing Act 1988 - tenancies with a binding contractual provision for rent increases are excluded from the section 13 notice procedure. As a result the application referring the section 13 notice of increase was struck out without any consideration of comparable evidence or valuation.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.