52 Midsummer Buildings, Bath, Somerset, BA1 6JH

HAV/00HA/MNR/2026/0138 · Decided 2026-07-13 · flat · 2 bed

£1325current rent (pcm)
£1400landlord proposed (pcm)
£1350tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Ground-floor flat with double glazing, electric storage heating (described by the tenant as old) and electric immersion hot water, laminate flooring in most rooms and carpet in bedroom two, plus a garden with a small shed. Some furniture is included.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: yes. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal found many of the landlord's 2-bed comparables were in better condition and had parking and/or gas central heating that the subject flat lacks. Relying on its own expertise and both parties' comparables, it valued the modernised property with gas central heating at £1,450 pcm, then deducted £50 for its relatively poorer condition and £50 for having electric rather than gas heating, giving £1,350 pcm.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.