5 Barrfield Road, Salford, Manchester M6 7EL

MAN/00BR/MNR/2026/0214 · Decided 2026-06-03 · room in shared house

£500current rent (pcm)
£2000landlord proposed (pcm)
£550tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Furnished ground floor room in a house in multiple occupation, with no evidence its condition differs significantly from comparables.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: yes. Landlord submitted evidence: no.

Tribunal's reasoning

The landlord initially proposed increasing the rent from £500 to £2,000 pcm, but by the time of determination both parties had agreed a rental value of £550 pcm. The Tribunal placed significant weight on this agreement, combined with its own expert knowledge of local rental values, and found no basis to consider the property's condition differed from comparable properties in any value-significant way. A claim of undue hardship by the tenant was rejected due to lack of supporting evidence, so the new rent took effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.