48 Martingale Court, Cheetham Hill, Manchester, M8 0AR

MAN/00BN/MNR/2024/0616 · Decided 2025-04-15 · flat · 2 bed

£600current rent (pcm)
£950landlord proposed (pcm)
£900tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Third-floor unfurnished flat with reported issues including damp in the bathroom and holes in the flooring, no lift access.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: no. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal used a landlord-cited currently-advertised comparable in the same building (Martingale Court) at £1,110 pcm as the most relevant evidence, adjusting down by £50 pcm for the comparable's more appealing building design and lower floor (no lift) to reach £1,050 pcm market rent, then deducting a further £150 pcm to reflect the subject property's inferior decorative order and specification, giving £900 pcm. The tenant's assertions that neighbouring tenants paid much less (£600-£700) were rejected as unreliable since unsupported by documentary or witness evidence.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.