41 Norman Davies Garden Wolverhampton WV14 OBD

BIR/00CW/MNR/2025/0741 · Decided 2026-04-22 · flat · 2 bed

£875current rent (pcm)
£950landlord proposed (pcm)
£925tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: No significant disrepair to the property itself, though common parts were reported as scruffy.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: yes. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal weighed comparable evidence from both parties, giving more weight to higher landlord comparables but also to tenant comparables showing lower rents for similar two-bathroom flats. Using its own expert knowledge of the local market, it arrived at a figure between the tenant's and landlord's evidence, with no deduction for disrepair as none was substantiated to the property itself. The tenant's hardship claim was rejected because rent was largely covered by benefits and the determined rent was already below the landlord's proposal.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.