36 Aspen Gardens, Hammersmith, London, W6 9J

LON/00AN/MNR/2025/0860 · Decided 2026-03-10 · room in shared house · 1 bed

£866current rent (pcm)
£890landlord proposed (pcm)
£875tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Room in a former council flat, no reported disrepair, double glazing and central heating, tenant disputed landlord's claim of a 2024 refurbishment saying it occurred in 2014.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: yes. Landlord submitted evidence: no.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal found the tenant's comparables of limited reliability as room sizes and specifications were unclear and some appeared smaller than the subject room, while the landlord submitted no comparable evidence at all. Relying on its own expert knowledge of the Hammersmith rental market together with the tenant's comparables, and noting all bills, Council Tax and a cleaner were included in the rent, the tribunal determined a market rent of £875 pcm, slightly below the landlord's proposed £890 pcm.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.