20 Vine Road, East Molesey, Surrey, KT8 9LB

HAV/43UB/MNR/2024/0640 · Decided 2025-01-21 · terraced house · 6 bed

£6000current rent (pcm)
£8820landlord proposed (pcm)
£6775tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Substantial early Victorian town house, fully renovated and in very good to excellent condition with modern fixtures and fittings.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: no. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal rejected the landlord's proposed rent, finding flaws in each of the four valuation methods submitted (marketing appraisals, averaged comparables with too wide a value range, a capital value/yield approach, and a time-adjustment using an inappropriate index). Relying instead on its own expert knowledge of local rental values and the evidence in the bundle, the tribunal set a base market rent of £6,500 pcm for the property in good condition, then added £275 pcm to reflect the landlord's contractual obligation to provide a gardener, which was not already included in the base figure, giving a total of £6,775 pcm.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.