2 Chestnut Crescent, Stoke Canon, Exeter, Devon, EX5 4AA

HAV/18UB/MNR/2024/0610 · Decided 2024-11-26 · terraced house · 4 bed

£1250current rent (pcm)
£1400landlord proposed (pcm)
£1270tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Dated house with some wear and tear, render falling off and damp patches noted by tenant, though with central heating, double glazing and replaced windows.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: yes. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal assessed the open market rent for the property in good condition at £1450 pcm, drawing on the parties' comparables and its own expert knowledge, then applied a 12.5% deduction to reflect the property's condition (wear and tear, damp, render issues), the tenant providing curtains and white goods, and shared utilities with an adjoining annexe. This produced a market rent of £1270 pcm. Given the tenant's hardship (being on benefits), the tribunal delayed the effective date of the increase to the date of the decision rather than the date proposed in the landlord's notice.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.