192 Dibdin House, Maida Vale, London W9 1QQ

LON/00BK/MNR/2024/0644 · Decided 2025-03-28 · flat · 2 bed

£1327current rent (pcm)
£1464landlord proposed (pcm)
£1384tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Second-floor purpose-built flat in generally good condition but with signs of damp in bedrooms, a tenant-altered kitchen and bathroom, and lacking flooring, curtains and white goods.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: yes. Landlord submitted evidence: no.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal first found a market rent of £1,950 pcm for the subject property if in good condition, relying heavily on a comparable let in the same block of flats put forward by the tenant. It then applied downward adjustments (totalling 29%) for tenant-installed kitchen and bathroom, damp issues, absence of flooring/curtains and white goods, and the tenant's decoration liability, producing a final figure of £1,384.50 pcm. The landlord's assertions of higher market rents in the wider area were given no weight as no supporting evidence was submitted.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.