16 St James Court, Heysham, Morecambe LA3 2BQ

MAN/30UH/MNR/2026/0081 · Decided 2026-06-05 · flat · 3 bed

£795current rent (pcm)
£850landlord proposed (pcm)
£850tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Ground floor flat in a modern three-storey development; tenant reported shoddy standard of repairs and undertakes some repairs themselves.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: no. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The landlord's comparables (2-bed and 3-bed houses) were not considered direct comparables and lacked commentary justifying their relevance. In the absence of persuasive evidence from either party, the tribunal relied on its own expert knowledge of local rental values to determine a market rent of £850 pcm, reflecting the rent expected if the property were modernised and in good order with white goods and curtains provided. No adjustments were made as no evidence supported them, and the tenant's request for a later effective date was refused due to lack of evidence of hardship.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.