134 Market Street, Tottington, BL8 3LS,Tottington,,BL8 3LS

MAN/00BM/MNR/2025/0850 · Decided 2025-11-27 · semi-detached house · 2 bed

—current rent (pcm)
£995landlord proposed (pcm)
£750tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Property in poor repair with damp and mould, damaged bathroom fittings, worn carpets, misted double glazing, and unfinished plasterwork.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: no. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal valued a comparable property in good condition at £950 pcm, based on agent evidence of nearby lettings ranging £750–£995 pcm, then deducted £200 pcm for disrepair and lack of modernisation (poor plasterwork, damp/mould, damaged bathroom, misted double glazing, worn carpets) to reach £750 pcm. The tenant's lower estimate (£650–£700) was not specifically evidenced with comparables. The tribunal also exercised discretion under s14(7) to delay the rent increase taking effect until the decision date due to the tenant's financial hardship, rather than backdating it to the notice date.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.