13 Cawdor House, Gateway Court, Matlock, Derbyshire, DE43TJ

BIR/17UF/MNR/2026/0092 · Decided 2026-07-02

—current rent (pcm)
—landlord proposed (pcm)
—tribunal decided (pcm)

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: no. Landlord submitted evidence: no.

Tribunal's reasoning

The application was struck out for lack of jurisdiction rather than decided on the merits. The Landlord argued the Section 13 rent increase notice had been served in error, as the rent had previously been incorrectly increased using a social rent formula instead of the contractual mechanism; the overcharged amount was refunded to the Tenant, restoring the rent to its original contractual level, meaning no valid increase had occurred and any future increase had to follow the contractual procedure, not Section 13. The Tenant did not engage with this argument or dispute the refund. The Tribunal agreed the Notice was invalid, so it was not satisfied its jurisdiction was engaged, and struck out the application under Rule 9(2)(a) without determining a market rent.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.