125 Acacia Crescent, Beech Hill, Wigan, WN6 8NU

MAN/00BW/MNR/2026/0311 · Decided 2026-07-20 · semi-detached house · 3 bed

£595current rent (pcm)
£850landlord proposed (pcm)
£800tribunal decided (pcm)

Condition: Property was generally dated with poor windows and kitchen worktop damage, though landlord had installed a new bathroom and heating system.

Evidence considered

Tenant submitted evidence: yes. Landlord submitted evidence: yes.

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal assessed the market rent for the property in good condition at £850 pcm, relying on its own expert knowledge of local rental values since neither party provided specific comparable evidence. It then deducted £50 pcm to reflect poor windows, kitchen worktop damage and generally dated condition, arriving at £800 pcm. The tenant's claim of undue hardship was rejected due to lack of supporting evidence, so the new rent took effect from the date in the landlord's notice.

Read the original decision (PDF, GOV.UK)

Want the evidence, not just the decision?

Around half of the decisions in this database cite a problem with the evidence submitted — comparable tribunal outcomes are usually what decides these cases, for both sides. We're testing a paid evidence pack and a guided walkthrough of the application, built from this database.

Landlord evidence pack — from £15

Nearby tribunal outcomes, a rent level likely to survive a challenge, and an evidence pack in the format the tribunal expects — timed for when you serve a section 13 notice.

Register interest in the landlord pack

Tenant pack — from £19

Whether challenging your rent increase is worth it, plus the comparable decisions to include with your MR1 application to the tribunal.

Register interest in the tenant pack

Not built yet — register your interest by email and we'll let you know when it's ready. This isn't legal advice; see the law and free advice options.